<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for space scape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.space-scape.com/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.space-scape.com</link>
	<description>adventures in design and development</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The future of Silverlight and HTML5 ? by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.space-scape.com/index.php/2009/10/19/the-future-of-silverlight-and-html5/comment-page-1/#comment-3585</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.space-scape.com/?p=139#comment-3585</guid>
		<description>"Though I’m glad to hear that (at least for now) that MS are not going with Silverlight for their forthcoming Office 2010 web apps"

Not me.  Silverlight is their new flagship product.  To me, it would have been a real feather in their cap to dogfood this for their Office 2010 web apps.

What is the chance that we develop our Silverlight apps and we target different environments... ie.   to be run as Html5 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Though I’m glad to hear that (at least for now) that MS are not going with Silverlight for their forthcoming Office 2010 web apps&#8221;</p>
<p>Not me.  Silverlight is their new flagship product.  To me, it would have been a real feather in their cap to dogfood this for their Office 2010 web apps.</p>
<p>What is the chance that we develop our Silverlight apps and we target different environments&#8230; ie.   to be run as Html5 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Expression Blend 3 Nuggets - Pt. 1 by expression blend - StartTags.com</title>
		<link>http://www.space-scape.com/index.php/2009/06/29/expression-blend-3-nuggets-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3576</link>
		<dc:creator>expression blend - StartTags.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.space-scape.com/?p=118#comment-3576</guid>
		<description>[...] all the basics that every designer and developer of WPF and Silverlight content needs to know. ...Expression Blend 3 Nuggets - Pt. 1This is the first of a series of short blogs documenting some of the little features and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all the basics that every designer and developer of WPF and Silverlight content needs to know. &#8230;Expression Blend 3 Nuggets - Pt. 1This is the first of a series of short blogs documenting some of the little features and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The future of Silverlight and HTML5 ? by Nick Harewood</title>
		<link>http://www.space-scape.com/index.php/2009/10/19/the-future-of-silverlight-and-html5/comment-page-1/#comment-3517</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Harewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.space-scape.com/?p=139#comment-3517</guid>
		<description>Good to meet you on Saturday Jon, sounds like there was plenty of walking/pondering going on after the event!

I think you're right - there's a risk of business logic creeping into the client, but I'd hope by following some best practice guiding principles it will be avoided.  Great technology can still provide a rubbish experience if implemented poorly.

As long as the distinction between Client-side and Server-side code remains clear (and i think there are simple ways of defining what should go where) we should be ok.  With AJAX/HTML5 i think the distinction can be made with the development languages... though with Silverlight, the distinction comes via adhering to something like a MVC / MVVM framework in the application: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to meet you on Saturday Jon, sounds like there was plenty of walking/pondering going on after the event!</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right - there&#8217;s a risk of business logic creeping into the client, but I&#8217;d hope by following some best practice guiding principles it will be avoided.  Great technology can still provide a rubbish experience if implemented poorly.</p>
<p>As long as the distinction between Client-side and Server-side code remains clear (and i think there are simple ways of defining what should go where) we should be ok.  With AJAX/HTML5 i think the distinction can be made with the development languages&#8230; though with Silverlight, the distinction comes via adhering to something like a MVC / MVVM framework in the application: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The future of Silverlight and HTML5 ? by Jonathan Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.space-scape.com/index.php/2009/10/19/the-future-of-silverlight-and-html5/comment-page-1/#comment-3516</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.space-scape.com/?p=139#comment-3516</guid>
		<description>On my walk home back from the Multipack event I had thoughts regarding the promotion of browsers and the restrictions that brings. With the implementation of databases in the browser and other HTML5 elements it will be tempting to put more and more of the server-side code onto the client. Are browsers going to live up to this? Bruce mentioned using of Basic style coding to run the canvas tag as it doesn't hold a DOM. Isn't this a step backwards? Javascript isn't fully oop and we could end up with most of our code being open-source whether we like it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my walk home back from the Multipack event I had thoughts regarding the promotion of browsers and the restrictions that brings. With the implementation of databases in the browser and other HTML5 elements it will be tempting to put more and more of the server-side code onto the client. Are browsers going to live up to this? Bruce mentioned using of Basic style coding to run the canvas tag as it doesn&#8217;t hold a DOM. Isn&#8217;t this a step backwards? Javascript isn&#8217;t fully oop and we could end up with most of our code being open-source whether we like it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reducing Silverlight XAP file size by Twitter Trackbacks for Reducing Silverlight XAP file size [space-scape.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.space-scape.com/index.php/2009/02/18/reducing-silverlight-xap-file-size/comment-page-1/#comment-3439</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for Reducing Silverlight XAP file size [space-scape.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.space-scape.com/?p=15#comment-3439</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CrowdSourcing - Fishing for Complimentary Work? by Nick Harewood</title>
		<link>http://www.space-scape.com/index.php/2009/03/28/crowdsourcing-fishing-for-complimentary-work/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Harewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 07:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.space-scape.com/?p=90#comment-501</guid>
		<description>I dunno - i think the bar analogy has legs :)

I don't know of many other sources like that for freelance work (one reason for its popularity i guess)

Interesting to see that www.freelancers.net is still going in exactly the same form as it had... 10 years ago?   I picked up some small jobs from there back in the day - mostly more trouble than they were worth... Old story of the lower the value a client puts on your work; the more of a pain in the arse they are likely to be.

My recommendation is actually "real-world" networking of the social kind.  Over a beer, at a conference, during a seminar, via a friend... its the way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno - i think the bar analogy has legs :)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know of many other sources like that for freelance work (one reason for its popularity i guess)</p>
<p>Interesting to see that <a href="http://www.freelancers.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.freelancers.net</a> is still going in exactly the same form as it had&#8230; 10 years ago?   I picked up some small jobs from there back in the day - mostly more trouble than they were worth&#8230; Old story of the lower the value a client puts on your work; the more of a pain in the arse they are likely to be.</p>
<p>My recommendation is actually &#8220;real-world&#8221; networking of the social kind.  Over a beer, at a conference, during a seminar, via a friend&#8230; its the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CrowdSourcing - Fishing for Complimentary Work? by Dylan</title>
		<link>http://www.space-scape.com/index.php/2009/03/28/crowdsourcing-fishing-for-complimentary-work/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.space-scape.com/?p=90#comment-330</guid>
		<description>Excelent post I was considering this instead of doing bar work for some extra income but at least I'd be sure to get paided for every hour that I worked in a bar and not have to work alongside 10 other bar persons auditioning pints to each customer in they hope that theirs would get chosen and they'd get paid. (I think your analogy was probably better) 

Do you know of any better sites for picking up a bit of freelance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excelent post I was considering this instead of doing bar work for some extra income but at least I&#8217;d be sure to get paided for every hour that I worked in a bar and not have to work alongside 10 other bar persons auditioning pints to each customer in they hope that theirs would get chosen and they&#8217;d get paid. (I think your analogy was probably better) </p>
<p>Do you know of any better sites for picking up a bit of freelance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MIX09 – Day 0 by Nick Harewood</title>
		<link>http://www.space-scape.com/index.php/2009/03/18/mix09-day0/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Harewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.space-scape.com/?p=77#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Yep - alternate graph paper / blank pages. Very neat - kind of notebook i'd pay good money for</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep - alternate graph paper / blank pages. Very neat - kind of notebook i&#8217;d pay good money for</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MIX09 – Day 0 by Steve Cerruti</title>
		<link>http://www.space-scape.com/index.php/2009/03/18/mix09-day0/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cerruti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.space-scape.com/?p=77#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Did the MIX09 branded notebook come with graph paper pages like the MIX07 notebook did?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the MIX09 branded notebook come with graph paper pages like the MIX07 notebook did?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MIX09 retrospective by Tim Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.space-scape.com/index.php/2009/03/21/mix09-retrospective/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.space-scape.com/?p=80#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the write-up.

Speaking for myself, I got the relevance of the Clear Rx stuff but thought it was far too long. Would rather have had more Bill Buxton :-)

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the write-up.</p>
<p>Speaking for myself, I got the relevance of the Clear Rx stuff but thought it was far too long. Would rather have had more Bill Buxton :-)</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
